Fisker stiffed the engineering agency growing its low-cost EV and pickup truck, lawsuit claims


Henrik Fisker stood on a stage final August and proudly debuted two prototypes designed to catapult his eponymous EV startup Fisker into the mainstream. There was the Pear, a low-cost EV meant for the plenty, and the Alaska, Fisker’s entry into the red-hot pickup truck market.

Within the weeks that adopted, Fisker stopped paying the engineering agency that helped develop these autos, in response to a beforehand unreported lawsuit filed in federal court docket this week. The agency, a U.S. subsidiary of German engineering big Bertrandt AG, additionally accuses Fisker of wrongfully holding onto IP related to these autos. It’s asking for round $13 million in damages.

The lawsuit provides to a pile of authorized bother going through Fisker, which is on the point of chapter. At the least 30 lawsuits alleging lemon legislation violations have been filed, a handful of which Fisker has already settled. A former director has filed a proposed class motion swimsuit claiming unpaid wages. A textile provider has additionally sued Fisker for greater than $1 million that it alleges the EV startup by no means paid.

The engineering lawsuit stands out amid the authorized bother as a result of it means that monetary cracks had been already forming inside Fisker final August regardless of the daring claims its CEO made on that stage.

“The lawsuit filed by Bertrandt is with out advantage,” Matthew DeBord, Fisker’s vp of communications, mentioned in an e-mail to TechCrunch. “It’s a legally baseless and disappointing try by what has been a valued associate to extract from Fisker funds and mental property to which Bertrandt has no proper to below the related agreements or in any other case.” He declined to touch upon the opposite circumstances.

Bertrandt says within the grievance filed in Michigan Japanese District Courtroom that it entered right into a “design and improvement settlement” with Fisker in Might 2022 to carry out “engineering, design, and improvement providers” on the Pear — a contract value north of $35 million, in response to a replica of the design and improvement settlement connected to the lawsuit. (The settlement additionally exhibits that Fisker had beforehand employed Bertrandt to carry out a feasibility examine, price evaluation, timing proposal and different gadgets for the Pear EV.)

In some unspecified time in the future after getting into into the settlement, Bertrandt says Fisker requested it to do comparable work in reference to the Alaska pickup truck. Bertrandt says within the grievance {that a} formal written settlement was by no means executed with Fisker for the Alaska, however that it offered a quote of $1.66 million that Fisker agreed to pay.

Fisker stopped paying Bertrandt on the finish of August 2023, in response to the grievance. The corporate continued to fail to pay invoices by January 31, 2024, bringing the overall unpaid to $7,061,443. The engineering agency additionally claims that Fisker’s determination to place the event work on the Pear and Alaska EVs on “pause” is an extra breach of the contract because it brought on Bertrandt to undergo delay prices.

Bertrandt says it had a gathering with Fisker on February 6, 2024 the place the EV startup “acknowledged its legal responsibility for fee of those invoices and agreed to promptly pay $3,685,000 as a partial fee” — however then by no means made that fee.

Breaching the contract, in response to Bertrandt, has price the engineering agency an extra $5,858,000 in “misplaced income, delay prices, and incidental damages,” which is why it’s in search of $12,919,443 in complete damages.

What’s extra, the agency says it demanded on April 22 that Fisker “return all of Bertrandt’s mental property” and “certify in writing that Fisker had not retained any exhausting copies or digital copies,” and claims the EV startup has “didn’t do both.”

“Fisker has been unjustly enriched on the expense of Bertrandt,” legal professionals for the agency write within the grievance.

Bertrandt isn’t the one provider to sue Fisker to date.

Georgia-based Corinthian Textiles sued Fisker in Los Angeles Superior Courtroom in early April. The provider claims it entered into an settlement with the EV startup in early 2023 to supply it with “custom-made merchandise to be used in Fisker’s vehicles.” It doesn’t specify what merchandise it made for Fisker, however the firm’s web site says its automotive division focuses on ground, trunk and cargo mats, in addition to “automotive carpet.”

Corinthian says Fisker “refused, and proceed[s] to refuse” to pay invoices and different charges within the quantity of $1,077,571.75.

Working time beyond regulation

Days earlier than Bertrandt sued in federal court docket, Robert Lee, an worker who labored for Fisker from October 2023 to March 5, 2024, filed a proposed class motion grievance in Los Angeles Superior Courtroom alleging a sample of overworking workers and never correctly compensating them. The swimsuit additionally claims Fisker didn’t reimburse bills and pay out wages owed when workers separated from the corporate.

Lee claims that he and different hourly workers labored “properly over” eight hours a day and 40 hours per week, and as an alternative usually labored over 12 hours per day. He claims they had been “often compelled” to work weekends. Fisker didn’t compensate workers for that further time, in response to the grievance. Lee additionally claims Fisker didn’t correctly monitor hours labored, and even deducted commissions from their hourly pay.

He claims workers had been “commonly compelled to work off the clock and [Fisker Inc] created a coverage to account for much less hours than the overall quantity of hours really labored” with the intention to “meet sure targets, to generate extra gross sales.”

Lee additionally claims Fisker “successfully coerced and pressured its non-exempt workers to work of[f]-the-clock, have their wages deducted, have their wages miscalculated, to shorten (tantamount to a missed meal interval) or forego meal and relaxation intervals (or not be paid for his or her relaxation breaks).”


Fisker began getting peppered with lawsuits in California alleging that it was violating the state’s lemon legislation as early as final November, which TechCrunch beforehand reported. The corporate has began to settle a few of these earlier lawsuits in what roughly quantities to purchasing again the autos, in response to court docket filings and an individual accustomed to the settlements.

Extra lemon legislation lawsuits have continued to pour in throughout the state, the place Fisker has delivered the majority of its vehicles in the US.

Clients could have taken motion in different states the place Fisker has delivered vehicles, like New York, Florida and Massachusetts. These states require that lemon legislation disputes run by arbitration, making it troublesome to know simply what number of actions could also be pending in opposition to the corporate.

In its current annual submitting for 2023, Fisker famous that it’s nonetheless defending in opposition to a proposed class motion lawsuit from shareholders alleging violations of securities legal guidelines. Fisker then goes on to vaguely say that “[v]arious different authorized actions, claims, and proceedings are pending in opposition to the Firm, together with, however not restricted to, issues arising out of alleged product defects; employment-related issues; product warranties; and client safety legal guidelines.”

It additionally implied that it has been contacted by unnamed authorities companies for details about its enterprise, together with subpoenas, in a brand new line of textual content that it had by no means included in any of its prior SEC filings.

“The Firm additionally infrequently receives subpoenas and different inquiries or requests for data from companies or different representatives of U.S. federal, state, and overseas governments,” the corporate wrote. DeBord, the communications VP, advised TechCrunch that Fisker “presently [has] no pending subpoenas from governments.”

Correction: The article incorrectly recognized Robert Lee as Fisker’s former director of technical providers. The Lee who filed the lawsuit is an worker who labored for Fisker from October 2023 to March 5, 2024. The article has been corrected. 

Supply hyperlink


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here